THE |
|
a cache of usenet and other text files pertaining
to occult, mystical, and spiritual subjects. |
To: thelema93-l@bitsy.hollyfeld.org From: LilWing623@AOL.COM Subject: LOVE in Theory and Practice Date: Tue, 20 Aug 1996 10:56:31 -0400 Do what thou wilt shall be thew hole of the law. In a message dated 96-08-19, Jeffrey Smith wrote: << is Agape truly inclusive of sexual promiscuity? Or is sexual activity just one of those things allowed by "do what thou wilt"? The Scriptural paradigm speaks of love "With all your soul, with all your heart, and all your might"--suggesting more of making Love an operation of Will, to be expressed as circumstances dictate. And I recall nothing in Liber Al to contradict this. >> >> Right Jeffrey, Scripture says that, and Liber AL says things to that effect, but is this Agape? I doubt it very much... that is, if we are describing Agape in the way the authors of the New Testament undestood it. And Agape is *necessarily* in New Testament terms *exclusive*, not inclusive, of sexual promiscuity. This is because theoretically, Agape is only to be had between two beings anyway : God and man. But, there are TWO kinds of Love. Agape -- which is exclusive of sex, and which is a more "Divine" kind of love, and that which is best described as Eros -- the Love that we have in our everyday lives between each other, and also our Love for the gods or God. And Liber AL supports this : "Nor let the fools mistake love; for there are love and love. There is the dove, and there is the serpent. Choose ye well." (I:57). When Liber AL talks love, even of Nuit's unwavering love for us, it is a selective love. Agape does not love selectively. It is an unquestioning love... a love that would prompt someone perhaps to make the supreme sacrifice for the one that s/he loves, as in the case of God sacrificing his son for mankind, and Jesus sacrificing himself for mankind, in New Testament terms. Kathleen Higgins, in her book on Neitzsche's _Zarathustra_ put it accurately : "The Christian law of love...proposes a goal of absolute self-denial and unselfishness, a goal that's incompatible with even the minimal degree of self interest that's essential to continued existance as a Self" (62). This is why I mentioned that the only cases I can find for Agape in Crowlean Thelema are: 1) as an archetypal sort of love... in theory, but not [usually] in practice, and 2) K&C of the HGA which involves sacrifice, and, is in every way an `Agapic' union. Chapter Delta eta in Liber Aleph cunningly describes Agape, detaching it from Eros : "Love is an Expression of the Will of the Body, yea, *and more also*, of that which created the Body; and its Operation is commonly between One and One...", pseudo italics mine. Sexual Love as a path to the gods is part of Eros, and is described in detail in Plato's Symposium, where at one point it's said : "[Love] is mediator who spans the chasm which divides them, & therefore by him the universe is bound together... For God mingles not with man; but through Love all the intercourse & converse of gods with men...is carried on..." (202e -- 303a). Is Agape prescribed per Libers AL and Aleph as the way we should Love in practice? Well, I can only find evidence *against* it, not for. "...nor do I demand aught in sacrifice " (I:58) and " For one kiss wilt thou then be willing to give all; but whoso gives one particle of dust shall lose all in that hour." I believe Liber Aleph in Epsilon nu (145) also warns against self-sacrifice for the sake of others : "But to persist in Dullness, in Satiety, and in mutual Irritation & Abhorrence, is contrary to the way of Nature. So therefore there is no rule in any such Case, but the Law shall give Light to everyone that hath it in his Heart & by that Wisdom, let him govern himself." Paul, in Lett to Corinths says something similar, but, in true Xian form, limits it to 'unbelievers' : " (Should the *unbelieving* partner be determined to separate, however, separation let it be; in such cases the Christian brother or sister is not tied...)" (7:15). Sound familiar? Remove the Sinful Restrictionand we have "O lover, if thou wilt, depart" (I:41). I repeat what I mentioned to you yesterday Jeffrey, that Paul's chapter dealing with sexuality is kept completely separate from the first chapters of Letters, because even the Bible distinguishes Agape from Eros. Well, I could go on all day, but I think I should quit here. Love is the law, love under Will. Elaine
The Arcane Archive is copyright by the authors cited.
Send comments to the Arcane Archivist: tyaginator@arcane-archive.org. |
Did you like what you read here? Find it useful?
Then please click on the Paypal Secure Server logo and make a small donation to the site maintainer for the creation and upkeep of this site. |
The ARCANE ARCHIVE is a large domain,
organized into a number of sub-directories, each dealing with a different branch of religion, mysticism, occultism, or esoteric knowledge. Here are the major ARCANE ARCHIVE directories you can visit: |
|
interdisciplinary:
geometry, natural proportion, ratio, archaeoastronomy
mysticism: enlightenment, self-realization, trance, meditation, consciousness occultism: divination, hermeticism, amulets, sigils, magick, witchcraft, spells religion: buddhism, christianity, hinduism, islam, judaism, taoism, wicca, voodoo societies and fraternal orders: freemasonry, golden dawn, rosicrucians, etc. |
SEARCH THE ARCANE ARCHIVE
There are thousands of web pages at the ARCANE ARCHIVE. You can use ATOMZ.COM
to search for a single word (like witchcraft, hoodoo, pagan, or magic) or an
exact phrase (like Kwan Yin, golden ratio, or book of shadows):
OTHER ESOTERIC AND OCCULT SITES OF INTEREST
Southern
Spirits: 19th and 20th century accounts of hoodoo,
including slave narratives & interviews
|