THE |
|
a cache of usenet and other text files pertaining
to occult, mystical, and spiritual subjects. |
To: alt.magick.tyagi,alt.magick,alt.magick.order,alt.thelema,alt.pagan,talk.religion.misc,alt.pagan.magick From: tyagi@houseofkaos.abyss.com (nigris (333)) Subject: Basics of Thelema (was 'Who's a Thelemite?') Date: 23 Mar 1997 12:44:57 -0800 49970224 AA1 Hail Satan! (waited long enough before addressing this) E6 Bill Thom asks some basic questions that are seldom addressed within the Thelemic community and constitute 'philosophical underpinnings' to a wide variety of perspectives contained therein. as I am rather outspoken on this subject, especially within this forum, I wanted to refrain initially and allow others to run with the ball. having done this, I now offer my reflections on these important queries and welcome review, query and comparatives from others who post here. Bill Thom: #...who is a Thelemite?... 'Thelemite' is an ideal, an auspicious individual who upholds and embodies the Law of Thelema as understood by the great sages of its propagation (to be determined, though this appears to include such people as Rabelais, Crowley, Grant, possibly Achad, perhaps others). compare this directly with 'Sage' as elaborated by _Tao Teh Ching_, the Confucian _Analects_, or other Eastern sources. #Is there a particular definition of a Thelemite that applies universally? there are many definitions of 'Thelemite', and I gave above only the one which I have tend to prefer. many of these *could* be applied universally, though as with all vibrant philosophical and religious communities, there is a diversity of opinion as regards preferences from the conservative and restrictive to the liberal and catholic. the most inclusive definition I can think of is not particular: 'Thelemite' means whatever the thinker thinks it means. #Are there standards that must be met? If so, who set(s) them? these standards are designated by any particular authority involved. that is, for an individual, that individual sets the standards. for an organization, the organization sets its own standards. in this way we can see plainly that there are a variety of meanings and criteria brought to bear in evaluation. often people within the 'Thelemic community' will apply this title to themselves, justifiably and egotistically so. much like the adoption of grandiose Masonic or Rosicrucian officenames, that of 'Thelemite' indicates a (gradually dissolving) significance as an appellation. #Must one accept, understand, or even have any knowledge of the existence #Liber AL? by some standards this is all that is required in the ascertainment of 'Thelemicity'. identified with the Cult of Thelema (does anyone know if this is the *same* thing as the 'Cult of the Star and Snake' and from where this latter phrase originates?), resident within Crowleyanity, what is regarded by some as a 'religion' (it is not so to us all) takes on the qualities of many other 'religions of the book' (an echo of both Judeochristian and Masonic influences). however, there are other standards which make plain the disassociation of any particular text and what is called the 'Law of Thelema'. many consider Crowley's _Liber Al vel Legis_ (the Evil Book) to be a 'Thelemic expression' and nothing more. some not even this. #Does one need to consciously have knowledge of one's Will? here we begin to enter into Thelemic philosophy as it is known to many who engage its discussion, adopting and adapting the terms 'will' and 'love' from a variety of (largely European, often Christian) sources to liberative ends. 'knowledge of one's true will (Will)' usually amounts to a kind of self-perception and awareness of one's place in the cosmos, abilities as regards causing change, and where this leaves off into the proper domains of other individuals (their 'orbits'). cultists typically only require a vocal (if not slavish) adherence to _The Book of the Law_ (whatever this means). sometimes this enlarges to include the consideration of Crowley as the Prophet of the Horusian Aeon, or other metaphysics. in this way it takes on the appearance of Western religious creed-membership. some Thelemic religious believe that a kind of 'initiation' (whether overt and socially-provided or personally-derived) into the Law of Thelema is needed in order to qualify. it may be that this is the first glimpse of one's true will. the most philosophic and stringent would probably claim that only those whose exploits consist of finding and carrying out their true will in the world are 'real Thelemites'. #Must one engage in particular daily activities? this is the common quality of the religion of Thelema, often integrating such rites as Resh, Will, or some other minor communal or disciplining activity which consolidates social and personal energies toward desired ends. less often individuals consider particular attitudes, exemplified by daily expression ("promulgating the Law of Thelema") as sufficient engagement and definition to qualify. #Is membership or non-membership in any orginization required? by some, of course. typically this is not the case. perhaps only the most extreme cultists (usually associating the Evil Book and the Beastmaster in there too). #Is agreement with any other living being required? as a rule it is not, and the matter of where one's true will stops and another's starts is often a matter of controversy within the Thelemic community as a whole. often the issue of legality and morality, exemplifying the cultist-philosopher divide, comes to the fore: the former usually requiring some sort of moral or doctrinal standard, the latter sometimes disclaiming any agreement save between an individual's actions and hir true will (this last being an ambiguous parameter). #Then there's some related questions: #Is doing more important than knowing or vice versa? usually acting within the parameters of the true will is considered more important than whether this is a conscious choice on the part of the individual; whether that person knows intellectually where those boundaries ought lie. in fact there is quite a bit of debate within the Thelemic community itself as to how best and whether indeed it is *possible* to come to know one's true will. #Can a King remain a King, regardless of personal behavior? Or are true #Kings identifiable through the wisdom of their actions? again this enters slightly further into particular Thelemic philosophical constructs (that of the 'King' as contrasted with the 'Slave'), at least as related within certain popular texts. answering for myself, I would say that a Regent is a Regent due to having attained to a certain level of consciousness, awareness, and that the actions or behavior undertaken by said Regent will reflect this. it is, I think, possible, for a person to avoid, obscure, deny or disregard what they know to be a 'wise choice', and in this manner 'abdicate their Regency'. for this reason I would be hesitant to offer unlimited latitude on the behavior of said Regents as exemplifying their depth of virtue. #If I acknowledge certain rights for myself must I acknowledge those same #rights to others? this brings to mind a comparative text (to that of the Evil Tome): Crowley's _Liber Oz_, one of the few documents of which I am aware that speaks directly to the concept of 'rights' within the popular Thelemic textual body. typically a stratified list of rights in which some individuals are afforded these where others are not is unpopular amongst those who study and practice what they understand to be the Thelemic Law. however, there is sometimes a division between "Kings" (my 'Regents') and "Slaves". the 'rights' designated to each can in some descriptions differ markedly. "the slaves shall serve", while we are left to presume that the Regents will be the ones so served. ;> whether and when 'rights' become involved between these two is of both historical (unthelemic? :>) and theoretical dispute. within historical monarchy the regent was often given some greater degree of latitude in behavior and power than hir subjects. as a Thelemic model, this is rarely discussed, and comes to controversy when discussing the notion of a 'Thelemic Order', directed or overseen by such a regent (or merely by someone assuming such a title as 'King'). #1. There are a significant number of people who, having no knowledge of #Thelema, Liber Al, or the Equinox of the Gods, appear to truly be #practicing some form of the Law. I would ask you to elaborate, since you mention it, on what precisely you mean by "some form of the Law" and what qualities you can describe which indicate to you that it is so "practiced". #2. There are a significant number of people who have read Liber AL, #probably have read The Holy Books, belong to any number of Magickal #Orders, proclaim themselves to be Thelemites, and don't seem to have a #clue what the Law is, means, or care to DO much of anything. pretend your audience is of this category. how would you go about informing us of what this "Law" consists? what have we missed which was ostensibly contained within the various sources or bodies you mention? it seems you presume there is one "Law" to *be* understood, as if, through examination, we will find a commonality amongst those who are 'in the know' or 'correctly aware' of the curriculum the latter have somehow overlooked. how have you arrived at this presumption? how have you determined that you are not among those of us who 'missed' it? what qualities do you see in this "significant number of people" which discloses to you that we "don't have a clue" what this "Law" means? E6/6/6 3 3 3 _______________________________________________________________________________ nigris (333) -- tyagi@houseofkaos.abyss.com -- http://www.hollyfeld.org/~tyagi/
The Arcane Archive is copyright by the authors cited.
Send comments to the Arcane Archivist: tyaginator@arcane-archive.org. |
Did you like what you read here? Find it useful?
Then please click on the Paypal Secure Server logo and make a small donation to the site maintainer for the creation and upkeep of this site. |
The ARCANE ARCHIVE is a large domain,
organized into a number of sub-directories, each dealing with a different branch of religion, mysticism, occultism, or esoteric knowledge. Here are the major ARCANE ARCHIVE directories you can visit: |
|
interdisciplinary:
geometry, natural proportion, ratio, archaeoastronomy
mysticism: enlightenment, self-realization, trance, meditation, consciousness occultism: divination, hermeticism, amulets, sigils, magick, witchcraft, spells religion: buddhism, christianity, hinduism, islam, judaism, taoism, wicca, voodoo societies and fraternal orders: freemasonry, golden dawn, rosicrucians, etc. |
SEARCH THE ARCANE ARCHIVE
There are thousands of web pages at the ARCANE ARCHIVE. You can use ATOMZ.COM
to search for a single word (like witchcraft, hoodoo, pagan, or magic) or an
exact phrase (like Kwan Yin, golden ratio, or book of shadows):
OTHER ESOTERIC AND OCCULT SITES OF INTEREST
Southern
Spirits: 19th and 20th century accounts of hoodoo,
including slave narratives & interviews
|