THE |
|
a cache of usenet and other text files pertaining
to occult, mystical, and spiritual subjects. |
To: alt.magick.tyagi From: tyagI@houseofkaos.Abyss.coM (tyagi mordred nagasiva) Subject: Re: Difference between actual satanism and atheism Date: 28 Nov 1994 22:52:16 GMT [from alt.satanism: dvera@met.com] Michael.Aquino@125-430.astaroth.sacbbx.com wrote: > dve> One of the things that annoys me about both CoS _AND_ ToS is > dve> the attitude of both groups' leaders that Real Satanism > dve> didn't exist until 1966. [...] > Well, you'll certainly find incidents and episodes of > anti-Christianity, and anti-Judaeo/Christianity, and > anti-Judaism, before 1966. Some serious, some sarcastic, some > artistic. But I do not equate these anti-things with Satanism, > which I consider a positive religion and philosophy in its own > right. For example, most people would not equate "capitalism" > with "anti-communism". I'd be interested to hear more about your concept of "authentic Satanism". I agree that Satanism is more than mere anti- Christianity. However, I don't consider Satanism to be one single religion or philosophy. To me, Satanism is a _category_ of religions and philosophies involving sympathetic re-interpretations of the entity Christians call "Satan". There's an endless variety of possible positive non-Christian interpretations of who/what "Satan" is. > The closest you might come to authentic Satanism prior to 1966 > would be in the artistic field: Blake, Baudelaire, Milton, that > sort of thing. But even then there is the flavor of mere > anti-Christianity. Although Satanism is more than "mere anti-Christianity", it necessarily does have an anti-Christian component if you live in a Christian society, just as a person who lived in a communist society but favored capitalism would necessarily be anti-communist (or, conversely, a communist living in a capitalist society would necessarily be anti-capitalist). > What made the Church of Satan unique in 1966 was that it embodied > a *positive* approach to Satan and Satanism, although it took it > awhile to disentangle all of the anti-J/C baggage even so. There _WERE_ other forms of _RELIGIOUS_ Satanism that were more than "mere anti-Christianity". One example was the Lady of Endor Coven, described by Arthur Lyons in _Satan_Wants_You_. Another example was the group in Boston that a friend of mine briefly belonged to back in the mid-1960's. You might not consider these to be "authentic Satanists" because their interpretation of "Satan" differed radically from yours. (They differ radically from mine too.) But their worldviews were certainly _NOT_ just an inverted Christian theology. In an article of yours that I read a couple of years ago, you quoted Eliphas Levi's statement that "When the Devil is called, he answers." Do you nonetheless believe that nobody before 1966 ever genuinely called on "the Devil" and got an answer? I can tentatively accept (subject to hearing more details) your claim that the pre-1975 Church of Satan was in some key ways unique, though this doesn't make it the only "authentic" form of Satanism in my eyes. Perhaps what made CoS unique was that you folks had less of a felt _need_ for the anti-Christian aspect of Satanism, since you naively assumed that Christianity was dead. After all, you were based in San Francisco, which was and is far less Christian- dominated than much of the rest of the country. Also, it's my impression that most of the early CoS people did _NOT_ come from hard-core Christian backgrounds (correct me if I'm wrong on this). My own form of Satanism has an anti-Christian (primarily anti- fundamentalist) aspect, but does not revolve around anti- Christianity. (I'll explain in future messages, when I have time, what it does revolve around.) If my _MAIN_ motive were simply to rebel against Christianity, I would _NOT_ choose Satanism. There are other "religions" that excel at blasphemy and, in my opinion, do a better job of it than Satanism does, e.g. Discordianism and the Church of the Subgenius. (Certainly they keep their sense of humor better than most of the self-described Satanists who post here.) Could you please explain why you see Satanism's inherent "anti- Christian baggage" as a problem? (I see it as problematic only insofar as it makes Satanism attractive to overgrown adolescent rebels-without-a-cause. You seem to see it as a problem on a deeper level.) I was hoping to have time to write to you in greater depth this past weekend, but I didn't. Maybe next weekend. For now I'd like to clarify a few points: First, I'll briefly mention that I'm polytheistic. I believe that different people have natural affinities for different deities. If a person has such an affinity, that person will function best if she or he acknowledges it. My own deity happens to be the Dark Muse, a.k.a. "Satan". Note that I generally use the name "Satan" in quotes. ("Satan" means "adversary", and I don't regard the Dark Muse as _MY_ adversary.) I feel that this entity can be more accurately referred to by various titles, such as "Dark Muse", "Dark Force in Nature", etc. Why, then, do I insist on calling myself a Satanist rather than identifying "Satan" with some pre-Christian deity such as Set or Pan? There are several reasons, most of which I don't have time to go into now. For one thing, I think it's intellectually much more sound to-interpret a religious concept from one's own culture than to try to import deities from another culture. This is not to say we can't learn from the religious ideas of other cultures. However, our ability to learn from other cultures is limited. Unless one makes it a lifetime project, one can never really understand another culture except on the most superficial level. This is true even of cultures that still exist _today_, with live people that we can still talk to. Thus, I question whether even the most erudite archeologists can really hope to understand something so subtle and complex as what an ancient deity might have actually meant to the people living back then, when we can't even ask those people questions about it; all we have are incomplete written records. (Imagine an archeologist several thousand years in the future drawing conclusions about the Temple of Set's beliefs based on a copy of _The_Crystal_Tablet_, in an era when the English language has been forgotten by all but a handful of scholars.) Hence I cannot, with any degree of confidence, equate "Satan" with any specific ancient deity (though I can say that "Satan" _seems_ in some ways _similar_ to certain ancient deities). I feel much more confident saying merely that I believe my Dark Muse is the same entity Christians call "Satan". Although I have a radically non- Christian interpretation of who/what "Satan" is (as I'll explain in a future message), I'm familiar enough with Christianity to have a reasonably sound basis for making such a re-interpretation. Anyhow, besides the perhaps-unanswerable question of whether the entity you call "Set" is the same entity the ancient Egyptians called "Set", there's also the separate question of whether the entity _YOU_ have connected with as "Set" (regardless of his possible ancient identity) is the same entity I have experienced as the Dark Muse. I suspect not. Also, your "Satan" may have been a different entity from what I recognize as "Satan". Furthermore, the basic philosophy of the Temple of Set, as summarized in the General Information and Admissions Policies document (and as was discussed at greater length in the Base of Set echo when I participated there a few years ago), includes some ideas I strongly disagree with. More about this later. Still, I'm interested in hearing whatever you care to share about your experience of "Satan". It would be interesting to discuss how and why you and I seem to have connected with possibly-different entities under this name. Diane Vera
The Arcane Archive is copyright by the authors cited.
Send comments to the Arcane Archivist: tyaginator@arcane-archive.org. |
Did you like what you read here? Find it useful?
Then please click on the Paypal Secure Server logo and make a small donation to the site maintainer for the creation and upkeep of this site. |
The ARCANE ARCHIVE is a large domain,
organized into a number of sub-directories, each dealing with a different branch of religion, mysticism, occultism, or esoteric knowledge. Here are the major ARCANE ARCHIVE directories you can visit: |
|
interdisciplinary:
geometry, natural proportion, ratio, archaeoastronomy
mysticism: enlightenment, self-realization, trance, meditation, consciousness occultism: divination, hermeticism, amulets, sigils, magick, witchcraft, spells religion: buddhism, christianity, hinduism, islam, judaism, taoism, wicca, voodoo societies and fraternal orders: freemasonry, golden dawn, rosicrucians, etc. |
SEARCH THE ARCANE ARCHIVE
There are thousands of web pages at the ARCANE ARCHIVE. You can use ATOMZ.COM
to search for a single word (like witchcraft, hoodoo, pagan, or magic) or an
exact phrase (like Kwan Yin, golden ratio, or book of shadows):
OTHER ESOTERIC AND OCCULT SITES OF INTEREST
Southern
Spirits: 19th and 20th century accounts of hoodoo,
including slave narratives & interviews
|