THE |
|
a cache of usenet and other text files pertaining
to occult, mystical, and spiritual subjects. |
To: alt.magick.tyagi,alt.satanism,alt.religion.wicca,alt.witchcraft,alt.pagan,talk.religion.misc From: satanservice.org@boboroshi (SOD of the CoE) Subject: Re: Is Witchcraft Satanic...? Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 00:03:04 GMT 50040315 vii Mary Meat! bobo: #>#> in certain time periods and religious perspectives it is indeed. #>#> some who write for witches and [even sources] that witches #>#> recommend even talk about the satanicness of witchery (e.g. #>#> "The Satanic Witch" and the Paul Huson book I mentioned!). Gemini: # That, is an oxymoron there are more connections between Satan and witches than disconnects, from where I'm standing. I'll try to see from your perspective and I hope you'll do the same. :> Gemini : #># Just because certain religions and people of certain periods #># *perceived* witchcraft as satanic, bobo: #> even some witches themselves. Gemini : # Again, it doesn't make it true. "truth" is just a matter of matching up a description to someone's experience. it doesn't make it true to you, of course. does it make it true to the people of these periods and religions? if you want a relative kind of truth such as defined by the individual, then yes it certainly does make it true. if you want some kind of objectivity (I'm *not* advocating for the infallibility or superior authority of the latter as regards knowledge, believe you me!), then I think there is also a case to be made, and I'm attempting to make it here in this thread, seeing through individual 'truths' (which I regard as opinions, sometimes uninformed) and toward a more comprehensive view on the whole of the real. :> # Just because someone perceives their self a vampire, doesn't # make them one. Or werewolf or intelligent or whatever. # Perception is simply that - perception. agreed, especially as regards statements of condition. saying that one is a vampire usually includes things about being "undead" (having died and now being a thrall to some kind of superior dead thing creeping in shadows afraid of light and garlic and the like). it means someone lives solely off of the blood of others, etc. the category of vampires is not clearly defined, in many ways like religious categories, but it does have to do with a *condition*. this is a very intriguing topic to me, which is why I seek to belabour the point slightly. I appreciate your willingness to persist in grinding out the rudiments of your ideas and the rational support for them. I think your points are important, and I'd like to contrast those from other quadrants here. from what I can tell, religions are different than categories of monsters like werewolves and vampires. we have definitive characteristics of these monsters, though they sometimes will shift slightly in the writings of others. usually when some individual CLAIMS TO BE a vampire, we can ascertain that they are role-playing, are not dead (or indeed undead), or that those who claim to be werewolves do not in fact have a disease which makes them grow hair all over their body at the full of Luna and become immune to ordinary bullets, ravaging the occasional passerby (lycanthropy only has some of these effects). we can class the "Satanist" as a kind of monster, but this is as unfair to the Satanist as it would be to class any other religious with monsters and demons, ever Other and relegated to some qualifying criteria which we will always control. I would agree, therefore, that perception is perception, and that if we wish to examine the true nature of things we have to look a bit closer and discern the facts. where it comes to religious individuals, it is almost always best to look at what religious say about THEMSELVES and see how much of what they say is carried out in practice. Satanists should be no different. #># does not mean that they are satanic. #> #> part of the problem is the ambiguity of the terms. religious are #> too often willing to accept a single dimension of meaning for these #> terms and broad-brush them across the whole of a topic area. this #> seems to apply whether the painter is someone seeking to condemn #> others [or] someone who seeks to evade the condemnation of others. # # This is true, and over time, makes the terms even more ambiguous. granted this, then we should not be surprised if the statement which I am contesting is in some meanings true and in others false. more below. #># Witchcraft is a very old practice, predating the Judeo-Christian #># entity of satan. #> #> there we agree. # # cool. :-) inasmuch as 'satanism' (which I would in fact discern from 'Satanism' by the way: the former is created by Christians to plaster upon their opponents and condemn and the latter is created by those interior or outside Christianity in regard to a concept, spirit or entity which Jews, Christians, and Muslims seem to have demonized and feared through centuries) is the worship of the anti-god of the Christian religion, we are in complete agreement that most of those who identify as witches do not venerate this entity and most are actually *anti-Satanists*, linking Satan with Christianity and rejecting the *existence* of such a being. it is this with which I expect you'll agree, and I think it true. however, inasmuch as 'Satanism' may be observed as a transcultural phenomenon as described by Satanists, the focus of admiration, or emulation, or worship appears to be something *dependent for name* upon the culture in which it arises. as such, the question of whether this being called 'Satan' (amongst any number of other names) is what Christians or witches or whathaveyou believe it to be immediately becomes important in our discussion on the matter. just as we would not wish to require everyone accept the biased Christian viewpoint on the matter of the character and nature of our Neopagan gods, whether as "demons" or "spirits of indeterminate character" or even "fallen angels", so we should not, as open-minded Neopagans, expect that all Satanists should cohesively adhere to some simple-minded inverso-religion about which some Christians and some Neopagans have become convinced. not only this, to begin to classify the existential character of the focus of other religious is *insulting to them*! there is really no need for us to decide for Satanists that their focus of worship or admiration is "merely an idea" or "the Christian anti-God", especially if they don't agree! we can listen to what it is that *Satanists* say about their religion and then begin to reflect upon this as what they themselves believe. some of the Satanists whose paths I've crossed do think of Satan as an idea worthy of holding up in Promethean, Luciferian splendour, symbolizing human liberation and rebellion against domineering gods like the Judeochristian Old Testament chieftain Yahwe or New Testament fictions. other Satanists attribute to Satan a far more concrete and interactive being of variable quality which they do *not* usually think of as inherent to Christianity. #> overlaps are demonstrable. the instances that I pointed out above #> (LaVey's incorporation of witchery into his Satanism and Huson's #> "Mastering the Art of Witchcraft", recommended by Wiccans and I #> might add a very well-written and entertaining book citing the #> origins of witch-powers as deriving from the Fallen Angels) are #> examples of these overlaps. combine this with the obvious witch #> craze incidents, and you cannot deny that at least some common #> ground exists between the two at least in folklore and in some #> trajectories of witchcraft as it proceeds into religious form. #> even such figures as Gerald Gardner focussed heavily on the #> figure of Satan and the notion of Satanist Sabbats in his early #> text reflecting on Pennethorne Hughes. # # There might be overlaps, but, just because a witch decides they # want to follow satan, doesn't make witches satanists. your logic is impeccable. I couldn't agree with you more to this point. anything that any single individual or member of a group does has no necessary bearing on the character of the religion of the rest. just because a Satanist decides that they want to undertake witchcraft, this doesn't mean that all Satanists are therefore witches. I'm not yet convinced that witchcraft is a religion, but we'll get to that. # At that point, they are no longer witches, but satanists here I lose you. why does this make them "no longer witches"? do witches have a particular focus of worship that forbids them from becoming Satanists for some reason? it is in part this kind of contention which leads me to believe that the Neopagans which are doctrinal *are in fact Christians, but antagonistic to their parent-faith* ("My gods exist, the Christian god and anti-god does not." etc.). # - even if they DO continue to use what they learned/practiced # as a witch. Sometimes things become bastardized, by combining # several beliefs into something else. Know what I mean? not really. I'm not sure of the beliefs that you think are maintained by all witches or all Satanists. the vast complex of Neopagan and neuvoreligious include so many differing kinds of people and groups, so many divergent beliefs, most of them apparently NONDOCTRINAL (i.e. no specific beliefs are required), that I don't understand your conclusions here at *all*. I'd love to hear more, however. #># Witchcraft has no connection to/nor any interest in satanism. #> #> my 2 examples above directly dispute this. all that you can say #> in response is that you don't think 1) LaVey or his daughter #> were witches (in which case you've begun a problematic attempt #> to identify witches as compared with non-witches), this is what you believe: that they were never witches as long as they were "Satanists" by your assessment (which I don't think that they ever were -- they specifically opposed the idea of Christianity and claimed to be atheists, but they identified by this name). #> or 2) Paul Huson wasn't making a connection between #> "Fallen Angels" and the instruction of witchcraft (in which #> case you're easily demonstrated in error with a quote from #> the text). # # See my above point. apparently you don't believe that Huson is instructing witchcraft, though some witches might have recommended his books. the text in question does contain clear references to apocrypha of Christianity (specifically the Book of Enoch -- check it out!). one might also mention here the text "Aradia, the Gospel of the Witches", which has the couple Diana and *Lucifer* as important gods. one might go all day denying something is "really witchcraft". what you consider to be witchcraft is apparently falling within a very narrow range. in fact, the narrowness of your views makes your claims false. #># There is simply no correlation between the two. #> #> there is a correlation in the minds of those who use witches #> as condemnation-scheme place-holders for heretics and Satan #> Servants. there is also a correlation between witchcraft and #> those who either identify as Satanists or utilize the stories #> of Christians to undergird their cosmological expression. # # The bottom line being that these people are ignorant, # and usually refuse to believe anything different, the first group I agree conform to this description and are blanketing their condemnation across all manner of individuals about whom they probably know or knew very little. the latter is not, and you have not made a case that they are in fact so ignorant, just stated it flatly. it is this latter for which I have provided very clear and well-known examples, to which you have not cogently responded except as to repeat your beliefs. # but, just because they have a warped perception, doesn't make # them right - even if *they* believe they are right. what does make someone (anyone) right? especially as regards what one is oneself doing and who one is oneself worshipping? why would you wish to repeat the errors of the religious before you who took it upon themselves to evaluate and dismiss the religious activities of others as "ignorant" without coming to know in some proximity those who were engaging in the religion? # Satanist are simply another sect of xtianity. and upon what do you base this opinion, other than that you have been taught this by Christians? # When you believe in/worship satan, many Satanists do neither of these things. # no matter *what* you called yourself in the past, or I'm not sure how this applies except that it excludes the condemnation schemes, about which we substantially agree. # no matter what belief structures you draw from currently, what if one isn't drawing from a belief structure? for example, it is my contention that witches stretch very far across a range of belief, and that belief ITSELF is not a qualifier for Neopagan religion of any kind. do you know differently? is there a requirement in your Neopagan witch coven that certain beliefs must be held in order to be a witch? if so, what are these beliefs? # the simple fact is that you are a xtian satanist, you've already agreed with me that terminology is ambiguous. granted this, "believe in/worship satan" is also very vague, inasmuch as the figure/character "satan" is given no strict identification, cosmological context, or specific qualities. your contention is that anyone with any relation of this type to anything they call "satan" (/Satan presumably) is ipso facto a Christian accepting Christian cosmology and values. do you know that there are very many examples to the contrary which I have logged and archived for a greater understanding of cross-religious tolerance? http://www.luckymojo.com/satanism/ http://www.satanservice.org/ are you aware of the fabulous website by the Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance (OCRT) promoting a wider understanding between religious, which maintains many very concise descriptions of modern religion, and which is largely at variance with your contentions regarding Satanism?? Promoting religious understanding, tolerance and freedom. http://www.religioustolerance.org/ does it matter that you might be spreading lies that Christians have helped to promote in order to divide up non-Christian religious and set us against one another, kin against kin? I urge you to think very carefully about the importance of the beliefs you have about other religions and what your criticisms and strong lines of demarcation may do to undermine what you value and what you actually believe. :> # and even if *they* want to call themselves a witch, # its simply not true. it is certainly not true to you. we can understand that much. # They no longer qualify as a witch under its truest definition. here is the crux of the discussion, then. what do you think is "the truest definition of 'witch'" and why are you so convinced that there are no other relevant or supportable alternatives? # Sorry if I was ambiguous, I really suck at orchestrating my point. I think you're doing fine! I hope we can work all the way through the meat of the discussion and examine the parameters of reliable knowledge, where it ends, and who should be making assessments of the religions of others, the status of the gods of others, and why. blessed beast! :> boboroshi at-sign satanservice.org: Satanic Outreach Director Church of Euthanasia: http://www.churchofeuthanasia.org/ TOKUS WEBLINKS: http://dmoz.org/Bookmarks/B/boboroshi/ Ninth Scholar's Library (Satanism Archive): http://www.satanservice.org/
The Arcane Archive is copyright by the authors cited.
Send comments to the Arcane Archivist: tyaginator@arcane-archive.org. |
Did you like what you read here? Find it useful?
Then please click on the Paypal Secure Server logo and make a small donation to the site maintainer for the creation and upkeep of this site. |
The ARCANE ARCHIVE is a large domain,
organized into a number of sub-directories, each dealing with a different branch of religion, mysticism, occultism, or esoteric knowledge. Here are the major ARCANE ARCHIVE directories you can visit: |
|
interdisciplinary:
geometry, natural proportion, ratio, archaeoastronomy
mysticism: enlightenment, self-realization, trance, meditation, consciousness occultism: divination, hermeticism, amulets, sigils, magick, witchcraft, spells religion: buddhism, christianity, hinduism, islam, judaism, taoism, wicca, voodoo societies and fraternal orders: freemasonry, golden dawn, rosicrucians, etc. |
SEARCH THE ARCANE ARCHIVE
There are thousands of web pages at the ARCANE ARCHIVE. You can use ATOMZ.COM
to search for a single word (like witchcraft, hoodoo, pagan, or magic) or an
exact phrase (like Kwan Yin, golden ratio, or book of shadows):
OTHER ESOTERIC AND OCCULT SITES OF INTEREST
Southern
Spirits: 19th and 20th century accounts of hoodoo,
including slave narratives & interviews
|