THE |
|
a cache of usenet and other text files pertaining
to occult, mystical, and spiritual subjects. |
To: alt.religion.wicca.moderated From: paulhume@comcast.net (Paul Hume) Subject: Re: Gardner-Crowley question Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 05:13:52 CST > I have a question for you experienced wiccans out there. You'll also hear from experienced Thelemites ;-) > I'm reading a book about Aleister Crowley and it says there: ?(...) > Gardner was a member of the O.T.O (...). True. Documented pretty much beyond dispute. > In the year 1943 he payed > Crowley to write a book about magical rituals. Highly unlikely. No indication that the two men had met that early (I believe Arnold Crowther introduced them in 1945 or 1946, a year or two before Crowley's death). > The result was The Book > of Shadows, that subsequently was accredited to a witch from the 16th > century. Even less likely. Crowley in his prime could have written the basic structure of the Gardnerian degrees in a few weeks time, based on his familiarity with Masonry and his ability to construct different mythic forms on ritual foundations, but by the time he meets Gardner he is ill, qworking away at several of his own projects, and did not indicate anywhere in his records undertaking such a task. > The style: a couple of anachronisms, rituals of the Golden > Dawn, whole paragraphs from The Book of Law give away Master Therion > as the author. A popular argument, but it sounds like a distortion of critics like Aidan Kelley, who did a close reading of Ye Boke of Arte Magick and identifies numerous sources, Crowley and Mathers among them, but not limited to them. > Furthermore many Thelemites were at the same time members of Wiccan > covens, where upon a certain syncretism developed." (from Christian > Bouchet, ?Aleister Crowley", 2000) Bouchet is making this up out of whole cloth. Let him cite the names of "many Thelemites" - there weren't that many at this time, in fact. He may be extrapolating from some of Jack Parsons' material written after his Babalon Working in which he speaks of "The Witchcraft" - but these were independent materials Parsons was developing for a more woman-centered cultus, independently of what was to become modern Wicca. Jack was never in a formal coven such as Bouchet describes. > This has been translated by myself from German to English, so I'm > apologizing upfront for any mistakes. Ah, then it is scheiss instead of crap. Not your translation, but the original. Regards, Paul
The Arcane Archive is copyright by the authors cited.
Send comments to the Arcane Archivist: tyaginator@arcane-archive.org. |
Did you like what you read here? Find it useful?
Then please click on the Paypal Secure Server logo and make a small donation to the site maintainer for the creation and upkeep of this site. |
The ARCANE ARCHIVE is a large domain,
organized into a number of sub-directories, each dealing with a different branch of religion, mysticism, occultism, or esoteric knowledge. Here are the major ARCANE ARCHIVE directories you can visit: |
|
interdisciplinary:
geometry, natural proportion, ratio, archaeoastronomy
mysticism: enlightenment, self-realization, trance, meditation, consciousness occultism: divination, hermeticism, amulets, sigils, magick, witchcraft, spells religion: buddhism, christianity, hinduism, islam, judaism, taoism, wicca, voodoo societies and fraternal orders: freemasonry, golden dawn, rosicrucians, etc. |
SEARCH THE ARCANE ARCHIVE
There are thousands of web pages at the ARCANE ARCHIVE. You can use ATOMZ.COM
to search for a single word (like witchcraft, hoodoo, pagan, or magic) or an
exact phrase (like Kwan Yin, golden ratio, or book of shadows):
OTHER ESOTERIC AND OCCULT SITES OF INTEREST
Southern
Spirits: 19th and 20th century accounts of hoodoo,
including slave narratives & interviews
|