THE |
|
a cache of usenet and other text files pertaining
to occult, mystical, and spiritual subjects. |
To: alt.magick.tyagi,alt.sufi,alt.islam.sufism,talk.religion.misc,alt.religion.gnostic,talk.religion.newage,alt.consciousness.mysticism From: tyagi@houseofkaos.abyss.com (nagasiva) Subject: Various: Sufism and Islam Date: 23 Dec 1997 22:03:41 -0800 Jim Bier: imo, when the claim is made that Mohammad is the 'final' or ultimate Prophet of God it sounds like the Christians' claim that Jesus is the 'only' Son of God. Both claims are exclusive and seek to limit God's action in history, again, imo. In Jesus' case the claims are also contrary to what Jesus himself said. I am quite ignorant of the life of the Prophet. Did he himself claim to be the last prophet? If history records that he did, I would think that likely to be the same kind of error as the recorded expectation of Jesus that he would return 'triumphant' in the lifetime of his disciples. My intention here is not to offend, but to explore and understand. jim bier YahyaM@aol.com wrote: > To a Muslim in tasawwuf, the whole idea of Sufism somehow predating Islam > looks very odd. It would be like saying that Adam came before humanity. > > As for Sufism being the essence of all the religions, present from the very > beginning of the human race, found among all peoples of the earth, we will > certainly agree to that. It's just that whatever you say of Sufism along > these lines is also true of Islam. It has become the habit of non-Muslims to > think of the definition of "Islam" being limited to the revelation brought by > Muhammad ibn `Abd Allah, peace and blessing upon him, 1400 years ago. From > our perspective, all the prophets beginning with Adam were prophets of Islam, > and Muhammad was the Seal of Prophethood with the final revelation. > > While the idea of Sufism that has popularly spread--that it is the original, > universal essence of all religions--is essentially true, this is just another > way of saying that it is Islam that is the original, universal essence of all > religions. All the prophets from Adam to Muhammad brought essentially the > same message. ======================================= ASHA101@aol.com: I'd like to follow up on Yaya's explanation which I think is an answer to the question from the point of view of meaningfulness rather than factualness, thought the two are related. There is a view which may or may not be shared by many sufis and that is that all religions are exemplars of various states of consciousness. That if one divided the one conscioiusness into the various states the religions would represent them. Isam is different from the other states in that it represents a state of subsistence in God rather than a state of the absenting of self (they call it anhilation of self but perhas what is meant is God subsitsing in self - the distinction between the two is an important one but one should be reminded that it is all part of one process) . This final state in the progression has an essence like that of smoke, which is to say that it is represented by ether rather than that of a physical element. It stands for the achievement of unity. There is, however, another state of consciousness, after all of these states of consciousness which is not represented by a religion in that it is not a separate state (or station if you will) in that it does not occur by itself so to speak. While the last station of consciousness (lets call it Islam) can be characterized by the state of being finally unified, the station further than the last station is a station which is the tie between the stations. While the last station is the result of the process the further station is the overview of the process itself. While the station of Islam is characterized by the viewing of God through his/her traces (one could also characterize other religions by analyzing their viewpoint, ie the methodology of the consciousness that they represent). This further station represents the knowledge of God that one has if the names of God were taken away. The sufi, therefore is the one who represeents the knowledge of God that one has if the names of God were taken away, but this knowledge does not occur outside of the names. It is like saying the knowledge one has of Mozart irrespective of any of his musical compositions. Of course, one cannot know Mozart without knowing his works of music, they are the same thing. The same is true for all the different stations; you can't know that which links them without knowing them, though that which links them is not the same as them. But, the most important thing is to realize that by dividing it all up into differenet religions, or different states of consciousness one should not loose sight of the fact that it is really only one religion, only one state of consciousness, our dividing is only done to serve a useful purpose. So, I've been trying to say what Yaya said without using any "terminology' and trying to show how what Yaya is not saying (though many Muslims do say it, and most non-Muslims assume that what Muslims are allways meaning is the following): that Islam is the "best" religion, that you'd better not speak of a prophet who comes after 1400 because it is impossible, or that Islam is the preferd religion, or anything like that. But I do think that what Yaya is saying, is something that one can easily agree with if you are asking the question, which came first Sufism or Islam, as long as you are considering the question from the point of view of meaning rather than an historical/factual view ... from the historicl/factual veiw, if one were to ask, "Did humanity exist before Adam?" one would have to say, "I don't think you can document this person named Adam, and in fact the first human was, by deffinition of genetics, a woman." One should not confuse trying to trace the roots and specific existance of an historical group with tracing the inner reality of that group even though they are both interconnected and of interest. The same problem shows itself with the idea that Isalm is the final revelation ... if you are looking at it as a historical factual thing then the questions don't apply in the same way as they would if you were looking at it from the point of view of meaning..... so if you were to ask are there prophets after Mohammed one could say yes, and at the same time if one were to ask was Mohammed the seal and last of the prophets, one could also answer, yes. - Asha ================================================= Yahya M : Thank you, ASHA. What I was trying to express is the universal meaning of Islam. I understand that not everyone realizes that it has a universal meaning. We still meet with this notion held by some that Islam is that "Arab" thing from Arabia. Allah sent 124,000 prophets and messengers to every people, each speaking the language of his people. The external cultural specifics of each instance of the revelation naturally vary from nation to nation and from era to era, as languages vary. The inner gist of the revelation is essentially the same for all. The message of tawhid (oneness). What Muslims would like to get across is that the meaning of the word "Islam" does not rule out any nation, whether Hindu, Japanese, Bantu, or Arapaho. "Islam" does not equal Arabism. Allah sent messengers again and again throughout the ages to renew the essential message. A few examples: To the ancient Egyptians, who were ruled by magic, Allah sent Moses with signs that outdid Pharaoh's master magicians---to break up the people's ingrained habitual thought patterns, to get them to consider Divine Reality afresh. To the Jews, who were skilled in the healing arts, Allah sent Jesus, who healed lepers, made the blind see and the deaf hear, and raised the dead. Again, to make them wake up and realize. To the Arabs, whose supreme art was poetry in the complex, subtle, intricate classical Arabic language, Allah sent Muhammad with the Qur'an, the clear Arabic eloquence of which left the champion Arab poets dumbfounded. When they heard the word of Allah, they had to know it was the truth, as long as they allowed their hearts to be open. One Arab poet actually stuffed wads of wool into his ears when he went near the Prophet because the Meccan oligarchy had warned him against the Qur'an. When he decided that he could think for himself and unstopped his ears, he realized that he was hearing the truth from Allah and accepted Islam. As for the Hindus, consider that some Indian Sufis identified the Upanishads with divine revelation mentioned in the Qur'an, the "Book kept hidden (kitab maknun)" (Qur'an 56:78). EOF -- (emailed replies may be posted); http://www.hollyfeld.org/~tyagi; 408/2-666-SLUG join the esoteric syncretism in alt.magick.tyagi; http://www.abyss.com/tokus
The Arcane Archive is copyright by the authors cited.
Send comments to the Arcane Archivist: tyaginator@arcane-archive.org. |
Did you like what you read here? Find it useful?
Then please click on the Paypal Secure Server logo and make a small donation to the site maintainer for the creation and upkeep of this site. |
The ARCANE ARCHIVE is a large domain,
organized into a number of sub-directories, each dealing with a different branch of religion, mysticism, occultism, or esoteric knowledge. Here are the major ARCANE ARCHIVE directories you can visit: |
|
interdisciplinary:
geometry, natural proportion, ratio, archaeoastronomy
mysticism: enlightenment, self-realization, trance, meditation, consciousness occultism: divination, hermeticism, amulets, sigils, magick, witchcraft, spells religion: buddhism, christianity, hinduism, islam, judaism, taoism, wicca, voodoo societies and fraternal orders: freemasonry, golden dawn, rosicrucians, etc. |
SEARCH THE ARCANE ARCHIVE
There are thousands of web pages at the ARCANE ARCHIVE. You can use ATOMZ.COM
to search for a single word (like witchcraft, hoodoo, pagan, or magic) or an
exact phrase (like Kwan Yin, golden ratio, or book of shadows):
OTHER ESOTERIC AND OCCULT SITES OF INTEREST
Southern
Spirits: 19th and 20th century accounts of hoodoo,
including slave narratives & interviews
|