THE |
|
a cache of usenet and other text files pertaining
to occult, mystical, and spiritual subjects. |
To: soc.religion.eastern From: W.F. Wong. Subj: Nagarjuna Date: unknown Quoting: |Richard Kucera (0000.ngrjuna.wfw) |Wasn't this all Nagarjuna's doing? Don't scholars mostly agree that |it was he who founded The Middle Way (Madyamika?) and then attributed it to |Guatama the Buddha? Not exactly. To begin with, what you have mentioned is but ONE of the many views held by scholars and what not about what Nagarjuna did. Among others I have heard are : 1. Sunyata is a concept which is also found in many places in Pali scriptures. What Nagarjuna observed was that with this single one concept he can unify the Three Marks of Reality, i.e. dukkha, impermanence and anatma (anatta). So what he tried to put forward was a unification thing - all the characteristics are unified just by this concept of sunyata. Sunyata is also a generalization of the Law of Dependent-Origination - the central message of Buddhism. 2. Nagarjuna is basically interested in denying the existence of the svabhava (self-being). Although clearly stated in the basic principles of Buddhism, it needed much elaboration in order to be successful in debates with the other atman schools - some of which were beginning to infiltrate Buddhism. Through the years, the opponents have refined their theory and debating skills and Buddhism needed to "keep up". 3. Nagarjuna was trying to show the futility of logic and conception by employing dialectical means. (This was the central thesis of "The Central Philosophy of Buddhism".) 4. (An even more radical version I heard recently ...)and he was trying to establish that faith is the way. Conception will lead to fruitless contradictions. He is supposed to have recommended recital of Buddhas' names as the 'easy' practice. So we have at least 5 different views (including yours). Which is correct ? Only the great saint himself will know. What is for sure is that he did not, not even for a single moment, not identify himself as Buddhist. You may say that he was wrong but it is clear that he did what he did in the name of Buddhism (as he understood it). with Metta, W.F. Wong.
The Arcane Archive is copyright by the authors cited.
Send comments to the Arcane Archivist: tyaginator@arcane-archive.org. |
Did you like what you read here? Find it useful?
Then please click on the Paypal Secure Server logo and make a small donation to the site maintainer for the creation and upkeep of this site. |
The ARCANE ARCHIVE is a large domain,
organized into a number of sub-directories, each dealing with a different branch of religion, mysticism, occultism, or esoteric knowledge. Here are the major ARCANE ARCHIVE directories you can visit: |
|
interdisciplinary:
geometry, natural proportion, ratio, archaeoastronomy
mysticism: enlightenment, self-realization, trance, meditation, consciousness occultism: divination, hermeticism, amulets, sigils, magick, witchcraft, spells religion: buddhism, christianity, hinduism, islam, judaism, taoism, wicca, voodoo societies and fraternal orders: freemasonry, golden dawn, rosicrucians, etc. |
SEARCH THE ARCANE ARCHIVE
There are thousands of web pages at the ARCANE ARCHIVE. You can use ATOMZ.COM
to search for a single word (like witchcraft, hoodoo, pagan, or magic) or an
exact phrase (like Kwan Yin, golden ratio, or book of shadows):
OTHER ESOTERIC AND OCCULT SITES OF INTEREST
Southern
Spirits: 19th and 20th century accounts of hoodoo,
including slave narratives & interviews
|