THE |
|
a cache of usenet and other text files pertaining
to occult, mystical, and spiritual subjects. |
To: alt.magick.tyagi,alt.magick From: tyagi@houseofkaos.abyss.com (mordred) Subject: Wizard: Spare vs. GD techniques (was: Re: sex magick & Tantra) Date: 28 Jun 1995 07:57:37 -0700 [from alt.magick.chaos: wizard@primenet.com (wizard)] Hello, JM555. You sent me the message by email and I tried to send my response to you twice, but it seems that your return address was not recognized and my email to you was returned. Luckily, you also posted here, so I will simply post my response here. In the future, if you wish to email me, would you please repeat in the body of the text your email address so I can be sure that my reply is properly addressed. Thanks. Anyway, here is the email I tried to send you: Thanks for your post. You represent your ideas very well. Let me reply to your comments, and then, if you would be so kind, please respond back to my comments. >Spare's system has significant >differences from the traditional GD or Goetic systems of creating talismans. > >First and foremost, the sigil is an original creation of the mind that is >going to put it to use. It MUST be, or it will not work. Yes, and the GD system of TELESMATIC (spelled correctly) does exactly that. You create an entirely original image and use that as your sigil. >Goetics and GD >styles prescribe the exact design and "corrospondences" of the talisman, >with perhaps small variations obtained by playing connect-the-dots on >planetary kamea - and even THOSE are prescribed exactly. The kameas have nothing to do with telesmatic magick. Please note that I was not talking about the well-known GD method where you choose-your-correspondences- and-write-them-down. This is the magickal system used by the GD that is not well-known (although it is in Regardie's books). It has nothing to do with the Goetia. > >Secondly, the GD talisman is "consecrated" via a complex ritual-by-rote, >a technique that Spare violently eschewed: That is absolutely true, although only partially so. Remember, I did write that what Spare did was a variation on what the GD did. The "ritual-by-rote" (actually, I think calling it a cook book might be more appropriate: take one of this, one of that, change this to that, etc.) was only part of what was necessary. The other part was to build up a cone of energy through physical and mental activity, and then send this energy into your device. If you do this properly, thinking about the purpose is unneeded.>(Spare, of course, was speaking from personal experience, having belonged >to the GD himself for a time.) By which time the GD had become decrepit and members were not using all of their techniques. Remember, Regardie saw Enochian Chess Boards but came to the conclusion that none of the adepti (or inepti, as Regardie used to call them) knew how to use the boards for divination. Further, I do not know if Spare had achieved 5=6 in the GD. Before that level, NO PRACTICAL MAGICK was taught in the G.D. I am not, of course, saying that Spare took his method from the GD, only that what he is doing is only slightly different from the Inner Order's technique of Telesmatic Magic. > >Thirdly, the most important step in utilising a sigil is to lose it's >meaning to the conscious mind. This is the exact opposite of what the GD >technique is designed to do; after performing one of their consecration >rites, the meaning and purpose of the talisman is pounded into the >conscious mind with a sledgehammer. This is again, partly correct. To consecrate a Telesmatic talisman you do focus on the purpose, but when actually charging it you would not think of anything except giving it energy. IMO, Spare's technique is a variation on this. For Spare (and please correct me if I'm wrong), the focus on the purpose comes only during the creation of the physical object, not during the actual charging. There is a time difference, but IMO, the techniques are basically the same. > >Fourthly, a Spare sigil is charged by inducing mental vacuity, by >bringing about the state of "neither-neither". A GD talisman is charged >by intense concentration upon it's purpose. Again, these sound like exact >opposites to me. Again, the above is true for regular talismans, but not for telesmatic magick. In fact, when using the telesma system you do not even have to make up a physical representation of the purpose, you could just use a visualization (which takes the form of an angel). >And finally, the sigil is released by physical destruction and by >forgetting about it entirely. _Again_, this is the exact opposite of what >the GD system calls for. While the GD system does not call for physical destruction, the best effects occur when you forget the purpose and goal. I find this aspect to be identical > >So all we are left with is the fact that both systems utilise graphic >images. One might as well claim that a television commercial and a >computer word-processor are the same thing, since they both display >pictures on a cathode ray tube! No, I think that there are more similarities than that. > >> As to Chaos >> Magick, as far as I can tell they simply redefine terms so that they sound >> like they are based on theories of the science of Chaos. Their basic >> techniques are still adapted from Spare, Crowley and the GD. > >Most Chaos Magick has far more similarity to shamanism than to the GD, or >at the very least is a working synthesis of both. It is my contention that the GD did have many shamanistic aspects. In the book by Regardie it is mentioned that the GD did rites of transformation (i.e., wereanimal rites), weather workings and other things more associated with shamanism than that Solomonic or Goetic magick. >Every Chaote determines >the nature of the technique hirself; in this it is the very antithesis of >the GD system with it's rigid set of corrospondences and prescribed, >unalterable rituals. You are again partly correct. As I said, it has been my experience that most Chaotes still use rituals based on GD rituals. Also, the GD magickal (not initiatory or preperatory rituals) were guides that were always changed by the magician, but, as you said, within the set of correspondences. Still, that set was so wide (see Crowley's _777_) that it left room for great individuality and originality. >> One thing I have noticed, however, is that many of the people in the UK >> involved with the Chaos system (esp. IOT), are well-educated, >> well-practiced occultists. In the U.S. Chaos magicians tend to be younger >> and take it up because they think they can get quick results without >> having to do much study or practice. > >Yes, I know of the "IOT" types you speak of - they are basically Thelemites >trying to be trendy, and fostering the same bankrupt hierarchical idiocy >that Chaos Magick is meant to destroy. While I agree that despite their words they are trying to have a hierarchy, I do not consider people such as Carroll et al to be Thelemites in any way. > >"Without a doubt the main reason for modern interest in Spare is that his >methods _work_. Their simplicity, in contrast to the convoluted ceremonies >of the Golden Dawn and their offshoots, which he first joined and >rejected, almost certainly derives from his interest in Shamanism. > >Unfortunately, there has always been a heavy Protestant Work Ethic in >Magic in the English speaking world. That there is merit in >"ceremony-by-rote" or in performing a banishing ritual twice daily >regardless of personal feelings is crap. If an activity can achieve the >desired effect in a few seconds it is the _best_, not the "laziest" magic." > >- Steve Wilson, from _Chaos Ritual_ I agree. But some people enjoy involved ritual. They enjoy what it evokes in them. This helps improve the quality of the ritual. As far as I'm concerned, the _best_ ritual is the one that works, not the one that is the simplest or most involved. In my opinion, if it works, do it. >Lumping Spare together with the GD (which he rejected) or Crowley (who >rejected HIM) only shows that you have very little understanding of Spare >or his methods. Have you ever bothered to actually read his works or >study his art? You're probably correct. I've only been collecting his books and art for about 20 or so years. Just for my information, and since I assume you've been doing it for much longer, how long do you think it is necessary for study before you begin to comprehend his work? > >That some Chaotes may make use of various GD-style techniques from time >to time is immaterial. It is the _spirit_ in which Chaos Magick is >practiced that is fundimentally different. Well, if you use GD-style rituals, and redefine things like Carroll so that new terms designate old ideas, we've still got a duck (you know, if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck...). > >You seem to be railing against efficiency. To the Chaote, simplicity is a >_virtue_. That magickal effects can be obtained without spending years >kissing the ass of the Grand Exalted Master Of The Temple is a _good_ >thing to me. Of course, practice makes perfect in any human endevour. But >"busy work", like regurgitating memorised rituals for the sake of sliming >after "degrees" is the kind of stupidity that the Chaos Magician rejects >as mere ego-gratifying nonsense. On the contrary. Efficiency IS the best policy. But efficiency to me means doing something the best way so that it works. That may be quick or may take hours. It depends upon the individual, the ritual, etc. I agree that I would not kiss anybody's ass. In fact, I have quit several groups because that is what they demanded. And I also agree that degrees mean little. As far as I'm concerned all magicians should be constantly learning new ideas. That makes all wizards, no matter what degrees they may claim, the same as a neophyte. In L.V.X. Wizard
The Arcane Archive is copyright by the authors cited.
Send comments to the Arcane Archivist: tyaginator@arcane-archive.org. |
Did you like what you read here? Find it useful?
Then please click on the Paypal Secure Server logo and make a small donation to the site maintainer for the creation and upkeep of this site. |
The ARCANE ARCHIVE is a large domain,
organized into a number of sub-directories, each dealing with a different branch of religion, mysticism, occultism, or esoteric knowledge. Here are the major ARCANE ARCHIVE directories you can visit: |
|
interdisciplinary:
geometry, natural proportion, ratio, archaeoastronomy
mysticism: enlightenment, self-realization, trance, meditation, consciousness occultism: divination, hermeticism, amulets, sigils, magick, witchcraft, spells religion: buddhism, christianity, hinduism, islam, judaism, taoism, wicca, voodoo societies and fraternal orders: freemasonry, golden dawn, rosicrucians, etc. |
SEARCH THE ARCANE ARCHIVE
There are thousands of web pages at the ARCANE ARCHIVE. You can use ATOMZ.COM
to search for a single word (like witchcraft, hoodoo, pagan, or magic) or an
exact phrase (like Kwan Yin, golden ratio, or book of shadows):
OTHER ESOTERIC AND OCCULT SITES OF INTEREST
Southern
Spirits: 19th and 20th century accounts of hoodoo,
including slave narratives & interviews
|