THE |
|
a cache of usenet and other text files pertaining
to occult, mystical, and spiritual subjects. |
To: alt.magick.tyagi,alt.tarot,alt.divination,alt.magick,alt.pagan.magick From: nagasivaSubject: Tarot's Application to ... Itself? Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2004 07:02:58 GMT # To what extent is the Tarot itself, via divination, l # capable of shedding light on its own origin? I appreciate the question for its complexity/challenge. part of the premise is that "Tarot" is an "it", rather than an event, or a variable set of objects. not everyone agrees on that. i.e. your question came with an embedded premise. like people who talk about transcendental Oracles of other kinds such as Yijing (the famed "Change Classic"), it is presumed that one may ask questions of it (the Oracle), or can without fail be consulted. inevitably some kind of 'Answer Cloudy Try Again Later' creeps in. the elements of divinatory consultation of this type appear to be analyzable to (at least): A) THE INTERPRETER B) THE CARDS (physical objects) C) THE ORACLE (i.e. 'The Tarot') D) THE QUERY E) THE RESULT F) INTERPRETATION as such, whether 'The Tarot' can do anything is subject to some dispute. whether people, using cards, can discover things about the past is pretty different than asking, comparably, whether some skilled Adept of the Mysteries, attaining to some exalted state of consciousness and thereby indwelling to the Cosmic Cause, can glean the truth about the past, present, *or* future. does the tool function the same way in the hands of just anyone? or is there some kind of skill involved? how reliable is the information given to the skilled? will they bet on it? :> many seem to presume a 'fair question set' from which one may select for consultation with the Oracle, for example. # [the question] strikes at the heart of what we really # believe about the kind of information Tarot reading # can provide the premise here is that Tarot provides. I'm not arguing one way or the other here, only pointing out that there is probably no consensus as to the premise that Tarot *does* provide things, as compared to whether seers, diviners, oracles, or in short, specialists, provide it, using the cards, some combination of the two, or a third, or even a fourth possibility applies. # ... and our degree of confidence in the veracity and # verifiability of that information. I've heard of people asking Yijing about Yijing, but some frown on this kind of recursive consultation. in some cases the disapproval comes from a presupposition about what the Oracle should be used for, and the goal of the Question may influence the response in a manner not unlike the irritable reference librarian who is being asked something which abuses hir specialization. she may be interpreted as responding facetiously, for example, or offhandedly, engaging commentary about the process (equivalent to "Foolish question!"). # So again: as we seem to lack documented evidence as to: # - the originator of the Trump images # - the exact date when these images were first produced there's pretty good evidence where these people are to be found, from what I'd gathered in Kaplan, Dummett, and even Waite. exact identities are being revised for particular decks (the move from Bembos to Zavattaris, for example, as relates to the decks they are supposed to have painted). the time (generally) and place of the composition of Tarot appears fairly well-known (northern Italy, 1400s, within a few different locales). historians of games have it pretty well nailed down at this point, as I'd understood it. corrections welcomed. # - the originator's intention in selecting those images that's very tough, though James and others are making sustainable assertions about this with conformance to what is known of the facts. # - the extent to which these images purposefully # incorporated esoteric or occult content, no evidence of this appears to be produceable at this time. most of what I've seen asserted here and in the literature of occultists as regards this adheres to a method which is insufficiently rigorous to rely upon. # or the extent to which these images were meant to # preserve or transmit such content this amounts to the same thing as the originator's intention in selecting the images, it just has a particular set of motivations selected. # ... how suitable *is* Tarot as a tool for exploring # these questions? a wonderful question, as I said. # Do we believe that Tarot is better suited for # reflection than as a tool for this kind of # research? If so, why? If not, why not? this is how I tend to think of the Book of Thoth. this is why I have called such occult devices, as a group, transcendentally, 'The Invisible Mirror'. as with the conventional objects, mirrors don't tell us about the past, only about the present, and that with certain twists (reversed right-to-left, for example, because of our visual apparatus (binary to the horizontal)). maybe certain individuals, when using a (particular?) Tarot deck, are able to have them function as a 'magical mirror', extending beyond their local time and place: (e.g. "Mirror, mirror, on the wall, who's the fairest one of all?"). however, I've seen no evidence of this latter ability. predictions about what will be discovered concerning the history of a thing *are* presentable. psychics sometimes provide us with these predictions, with, what I am able to see, variable results. # Do we believe it's possible to explore issues like # those listed above -- and generate specific, # testable, concrete answers with a Tarot deck? # If so, why? If not, why not? there's no reason that someone could not infer such evaluations of the past. the immediate question one might ask about this is: does it take a particular level of skill to get good results? how might one measure this skill or adeptship? # Might we discover that the cards could somehow # generate a description, a number, a place name, # or some other lead that scholars could use to link # Tarot's appearance to a specific date or individual? the cards alone can only generate configurations of their layout; sequences of their precedence, in deck composition after shuffling, presentation in layout, or in revelation. after that, they must be interpreted. in other words, a deck without a reader is speechless within this type of consultation. the quality or skill of a reader thereupon becomes important. # Might we engage in an experiment in which twenty-five # people with widely acknowledged skill with or # knowledge of Tarot attempted to generate answers # ... and compare their results, looking for a common # thread that might point to empirically verifiable facts? such experiments for magic have also been suggested. the problem with using them to determine the history of Tarot is that there may well be no verification possible. we might not ever be able to pin it down past a certain locale and general time period, based on the absence of evidence which remains. testing of the kind you are suggesting IS possible nonetheless (with artificial delimiters about what is being inquired). # Or are we forced to admit that, if fifty different # people tried to generate answers to these questions # with their tarot decks, that they would receive # fifty different, conflicting (or vague and # "touchy-feely") responses? I see no reason why the results would have to be vague. like psychic reading or any other kind of divination or fortune-telling, the specificity of the result appears to be dependent upon the confidence of the reader. one might use any number of divinatory tools to discern a specific culprit for a crime, for example. whatever is capable of being described by a psychic is, rationally, a potential result of an individual consulting Tarot. as such, studies such as have supposedly been conducted as relates to psychic phenomena could be reproduced. I don't think that at present we are forced to admit your suggested outcome, no. # In the end, might we conclude that Tarot, as a tool, # is better suited for answering questions like "How # can I find true love?" than "Who was the originator # of Tarot?" it is widely-known that some Oracle devices have predispositions to certain types of questions, and the request for specific information (such as who did what) rather than offering a choice amongst a throng or set of options, might be prohibitive. # If so, what would that conclusion suggest? concluding that tools are more easily used for certain kinds of applications only tells us about the facility with which the tool may be applied. we have to generalize *beyond* the options available and try to understand how it is that "How can I find true love?" questions differ, in content, form, or quality, from those like "Who was the originator of the Tarot?" specificity toward certain responses (e.g. positive/negative: "Were the originator(s) of Tarot located in Italy during the 1400s?" or "Of the following list, were there some who were more involved with the origins of Tarot than the rest?" etc.) might be amenable to productive results, as may the *reader*'s familiarity with the subject matter about which is being asked (so as to make more plain to hir what the cards may mean in response). nagasiva
The Arcane Archive is copyright by the authors cited.
Send comments to the Arcane Archivist: tyaginator@arcane-archive.org. |
Did you like what you read here? Find it useful?
Then please click on the Paypal Secure Server logo and make a small donation to the site maintainer for the creation and upkeep of this site. |
The ARCANE ARCHIVE is a large domain,
organized into a number of sub-directories, each dealing with a different branch of religion, mysticism, occultism, or esoteric knowledge. Here are the major ARCANE ARCHIVE directories you can visit: |
|
interdisciplinary:
geometry, natural proportion, ratio, archaeoastronomy
mysticism: enlightenment, self-realization, trance, meditation, consciousness occultism: divination, hermeticism, amulets, sigils, magick, witchcraft, spells religion: buddhism, christianity, hinduism, islam, judaism, taoism, wicca, voodoo societies and fraternal orders: freemasonry, golden dawn, rosicrucians, etc. |
SEARCH THE ARCANE ARCHIVE
There are thousands of web pages at the ARCANE ARCHIVE. You can use ATOMZ.COM
to search for a single word (like witchcraft, hoodoo, pagan, or magic) or an
exact phrase (like Kwan Yin, golden ratio, or book of shadows):
OTHER ESOTERIC AND OCCULT SITES OF INTEREST
Southern
Spirits: 19th and 20th century accounts of hoodoo,
including slave narratives & interviews
|