THE |
|
a cache of usenet and other text files pertaining
to occult, mystical, and spiritual subjects. |
To: alt.magick.tyagi,alt.magick,alt.tarot From: tyagi@houseofkaos.abyss.com (nagasiva) Subject: Divination and Psychicism (was Re: 'Real' vs. 'Nonhistorical, Intuitive' Meanings (was Re: Dog in The Fool card?) Date: 13 May 1997 01:47:29 -0700 49970513 AA1 Hail Satan! "Jan Tier": #># if a person was (were?) a naturally gifted psychic, #> ~~~~~~~ "Jan Tier" : # ...a psychic [is]...a person with clairvoyant ability or sixth sense -- # having knowledge of past, present or potential future events without # having been told or otherwise acquiring that information via # traditional means. I suppose that the tarot could be by your description a 'nontraditional means' of coming about this type of information? if so, then you don't have to be a psychic to be a tarot reader, doing a reading is effectively a "psychic act" by your definition. however, you previously said that a "psychic" was someone who had certain qualifications *prior* to tarot usage, some sort of abilities which *enabled* one to use the tool of tarot effectively. perhaps, therefore, the 'nontraditional means' of acquiring information was some kind of mental experience and using the tarot cards as some sort of 'trigger mechanism', a tool by which this psychic power is unlocked and exercised? this would explain some of your commentary which has come up in our thread thusfar. more below. #># ...the particular tool used (crystals, Ouija board, tarot #># cards, personal item belonging to querant, whatever) would just be a #># personal preference; the reader would be using the tool as a channel, #># per se, and would use tarot as a springboard for their own intuitive #># gifts. # ...Many psychics say they hear spirit[s] or voices that speak to them; the GD/Crowley 'angel of the tarot' is perhaps related here, yes. # if this is so, it would seem to me that they would have the ability to # acquire or access that knowledge independently from the use of tarot, # scrying, or whatever. it seems very logical to me that they might try to develop that into an independent skill, or at least one related to different channels, yes. # That they would use tarot as a source of inspiration (channel) that # would fuel their own abilities, rather than a primary means of acquiring # insight or information, that's all. this is a very interesting point. you seem to be discerning between not only the ultimate source of revealed knowledge (angel vs. cards) but the degree of reliance upon the tool itself, when making a distinction between a 'psychic', whom you associate with spirit contact, and a 'tarot reader', whom you seem to be identifying as 'anyone that interprets tarot in a divinatory reading utilizing only the cards to arrive at the final result.' I think there is a great deal of truth in the associations you've made, though neither do all psychics think they are engaged in that kind of contact, nor is this contact necessarily all that unfamiliar to traditional tarot readers or occultists. for example, in Crowley's book describing the deck he and Lady Frieda Harris created, he writes: 2. Take the cards in your left hand. In the right hand hold the wand over them, and say: I invoke thee, I A O, that thou wilt send H R U, the great Angel that is set over the operations of this Secret Wisdom, to lay his hand invisibly upon these consecrated cards of art, that thereby we may obtain true knowledge of hidden things, to the glory of thine ineffable Name. Amen. -------------------------------------------------------- _The Book of Thoth_, by Aleister Crowley, Weiser, 1981; p. 250. _______________________________________________________________ one remarkable thing about this is that in the bulk of Crowley's works it is fairly commonly acknowledged that his Main Objective, indeed the entire focus of his magick, was dedicated to what he called the "Knowledge and Conversation of the Holy Guardian Angel". I don't know who "H R U" is or was (I've never followed Crowley's instructions in using his deck ;>), but it seems quite clear that the description you gave regarding "psychics" is reflected very strongly by at least one very well-respected tarot-originator (angelic source of the knowledge). one might say that Crowley is 'calling the angel into the deck', and yet it is only HRU's hand which is layed upon the deck. that is, he is using the deck as a "channel" (by your language) to "obtain the knowledge of hidden things", precisely the description you gave of a 'psychic tarot reader'. matters get even more comedic when, from _Moonchild_ we come to understand how much Crowley seems to have disliked 'spiritualists' (mediums), no matter how much he may have enjoyed of Blavatsky. # I hope to learn enough about the subject (through study) to be able to # effectively read and interpret the symbolism on the cards.... consider the possibility that 'study' may include 'doing readings' in which you begin to assimilate the symbolism of the cards in the context of interpretation, regardless of whether or not you utilize traditional associations. I gathered that you were lending your voice to Jess's, indicating that solely the historical association-schema was the correct, and that 'psychic readers' might develop their own, but that this was something of a different process (and worthy of a different categori- zation). in such a case it would be easiest to start out with small amounts of cards, 1, 2, 3, and designate their signficance before seeing their face. such as: 'what is the general character of my present?' then read some about the card you select. there are a number of very lovely tarot-layout configuration in a REF lying about if you need them, and I'd post them if you can't get to it in the alt.magick FAQ. #># I am somewhat intuitive, but would not consider myself a psychic or #># particularly gifted in that area. # ...reading tarot would not necessarily *require* clairvoyant ability. typically 'clairvoyance' includes what is called 'far-seeing', and is a type of 'extra-sensory perception' within the field of the paranormal. it would not ordinarily be a necessary skill of tarot readers, even those who considered themselves 'psychics' or to be possessed of what are traditionally called 'psychic skills'. an example of clairvoyance is if I were to begin seeing through your eyes and look around at all the objects and events which occurred in your room. later I would (according to this ideology, I have no evidence for it) be able to describe what you saw in detail. it does not require that I have been using your eyes, however. some people explain it through an association with 'astral travel' (spirit travel to other physical locales). #># Most of the books I have read on the subject appear to assume that #># their reader *is* psychic, to me, anyway. nagasiva : #> really? could you elaborate here? what did the books presume you were #> able to do that you were not? could you suggest some of the books which #> gave you this impression? # *Fairfield's "Choice-Centered Tarot," in the introduction, primarily # discusses using tarot as a tool to tune into psychic capability. using tarot to tune into psychic ability is not the same as having a prerequisite of being psychic in order to read. # *Juliet Sharman-Burke's "The Complete Book of Tarot" (p. 8) states that # "The cards are intended as springboards for the intuitive powers to start # working from and feelings evoked by the images are therefore the final # touchstone for good divinatory interpretation." exactly, as springboards, which means that you don't have to be able to do psychic things in order to read tarot, but that they can be used to inspire psychic ability. note the association here with 'divination'. # *Jana Riley's "The Tarot Book" (p. 44) states, "When you are interpreting # the cards, you are listening to the conscious, the subconscious, and the # superconscious. If you reach a certain degree of awareness, when doing a # reading you will perceive the Force flowing from the archetypes to you, # from you to the person being read for, from the person being read for # back to you, and around again." I do not interpret any psychic skill required as prerequisite here either. Riley is describing how it feels (and her explanation as to why) when one does a good reading. no 'psychic abilities' necessary. # *Carl Japikse's "Exploring the Tarot" (p. 18) discusses the many levels of # intuitive skill, from the simplest (fortunetelling) to the most profound, # interacting directly with archetypal forces and our own spiritual essence. I wonder if he was the one using 'fortune-telling' (some authors do, but it seems somewhat unusual outside a very cheap line of books). however, no psychic skills listed as prerequisite in your text here either. # They seem to infer that the intuitive ability will develop over a period of # time; it might, I don't know for certain. yes, that is precisely what I think they are talking about, an enhancement and development of the intuitive skill. not only this, but a development of an ability to engage divination, which can have all manner of objects as focal language. the tarot is a popular focus because it is loaded with both archetypal and rudimentary symbols, and once you have become accustomed to reading the symbols from a tarot deck you can move on to other classical divinatory systems as well as life-contextual 'conversations' with greater agents (esp. if you begin to see all objects in your environs as symbols, which Crowley and others have described as related to the 'Oath of Abyss', and to the qabalah). #># I have tried, with dismal results, the recommended meditation practices #># ("enter" the card, etc.) and pretty much given up on that route. # Several of the books I have read give specific examples and/or exercises on # how to do this type of meditation/visualization. [books, (thanks for the list!) omitted] # They refer to the visualization technique of imagining yourself entering # the card, actually stepping into it, looking all around at the people, # landscape, etc. and interacting with the characters depicted there, # imagining what they would say to you, and so forth. As a matter of fact, # *so many* of the books mentioned this technique that I just assumed I was # exceptionally dull in not being able to practice this method. actually I don't think it is by any means the only way to learn tarot. I have rarely if *ever* encountered tarot this way except during extended periods of contemplation of certain cards. as I have said already, it may be as simple a matter as that you learn differently and would benefit from just diving in and *doing it* without worrying about whether you are doing it 'correctly', despite what any critics might say otherwise. that you have some confidence in your own intuitive skill is an asset. if you have such a library as you appear to at your disposal, it will provide you with a rudimentary association schema from which to proceed. I would advise you to attribute whatever meaning *you* find valuable to the cards, perhaps varying this or informing it with study, but don't let your lack of book-studies inhibit your use of the cards! it may be one of the most important things you can do to jump in and actually DO READINGS. I found it valuable to record the layouts and, at times, my interpreta- tions, for later reference. more often I just got a direct value in using the cards to reflect on my own life situations. I looked up cards in books (cheapo books and the more 'classical') and took what I liked from them. this method has consistently served me well. now I only consult additional references when I don't feel I know a card well enough. over the years I have got a pretty good feel for what I associate with each card, especially having done some analytical review of the elements of symbolic structure in the deck and of the field of symbolism as a whole. these are *supplementary* studies which allow one to deepen and broaden one's abilities beyond the real experience which comes from getting in there and *handling the cards*. #> take up some book (any book, since you seem to like them) # Ah, a little wry humor . I did read just about every book I could get my # hands on in this past year. then I'd say you are ready to begin with experiments if you like. some people can't read for themselves, for whatever reason. some ONLY like to do so (I'm one of the latter). exploring both can be helpful in coming to realize from what you derive most value. even if you just play cardgames with the tarot cards, or just shuffle them and look at them admiringly now and again while so doing you will be on your way to assimilating their content on an unconscious level. I'm trying to put this into words in part because I know that this (alt.tarot) forum is sometimes overshadowed by the critics who don't take my approach to the tarot seriously. In part I want you to know some of the alternatives available to you, however you understand the deck(s) and your relationship to them. thanks for your patience with our language-synch. tyagi -- see http://www.hollyfeld.org/~tyagi/nagasiva.html and call: 408/2-666-SLUG!!! ---- (emailed replies may be posted) ---- CC public replies to author ---- * * * Asphalta Cementia Metallica Polymera Coyote La Cucaracha Humana * * *
The Arcane Archive is copyright by the authors cited.
Send comments to the Arcane Archivist: tyaginator@arcane-archive.org. |
Did you like what you read here? Find it useful?
Then please click on the Paypal Secure Server logo and make a small donation to the site maintainer for the creation and upkeep of this site. |
The ARCANE ARCHIVE is a large domain,
organized into a number of sub-directories, each dealing with a different branch of religion, mysticism, occultism, or esoteric knowledge. Here are the major ARCANE ARCHIVE directories you can visit: |
|
interdisciplinary:
geometry, natural proportion, ratio, archaeoastronomy
mysticism: enlightenment, self-realization, trance, meditation, consciousness occultism: divination, hermeticism, amulets, sigils, magick, witchcraft, spells religion: buddhism, christianity, hinduism, islam, judaism, taoism, wicca, voodoo societies and fraternal orders: freemasonry, golden dawn, rosicrucians, etc. |
SEARCH THE ARCANE ARCHIVE
There are thousands of web pages at the ARCANE ARCHIVE. You can use ATOMZ.COM
to search for a single word (like witchcraft, hoodoo, pagan, or magic) or an
exact phrase (like Kwan Yin, golden ratio, or book of shadows):
OTHER ESOTERIC AND OCCULT SITES OF INTEREST
Southern
Spirits: 19th and 20th century accounts of hoodoo,
including slave narratives & interviews
|