THE |
|
a cache of usenet and other text files pertaining
to occult, mystical, and spiritual subjects. |
To: alt.magick.tyagi,alt.divination,alt.magick,alt.occult,talk.religion.misc From: tyagi@houseofkaos.abyss.com (hara) Subject: Gematria and Its Uses Date: 28 Feb 1998 19:04:29 -0800 49980126 aa2 Hail Satan! [wished to remain anonymous: # From IR's introduction to 777: # "As a method it [the practice of Gematria] # reminds me somewhat of the mysteries surrounding the usage of the # koan in the Rinzai sect of Zen. It seems at first sight nothing # but perfect nonsense, this taking liberties with names and letters # and numbers. But in point of fact, just as the koan is a # meaningful but not necessarily rational statement made from a # mystical level of consciousness, so also it may be used to # induce a similar type of illumination in the determined # student who uses it. Depending on the spiritual state of the reader, # Gematria will be perceived either as nonsense of the most grotesque # description, or it will awaken some simulacrum of the mystical state # originally experienced by its writer." # # To begin, then, Gematria can be employed in communication. quite possible, though koans aren't always meaningful or employed for communication. # One finds gematric analyses throughout AC's work; and it seems that # IR would hold that the reader's apprehension of such analyses will # depend upon "the spiritual state of the reader," which phrase I # don't think it necessary to understand as "grade" or "level of # attainment" when "attitude" or "orientation" can work just as well. I'd never considered so dissecting an analysis previously. it seems to me that a 'spiritual state' can be engaged which has nothing to do with one's grade or more permanent level. very interesting. # So understanding attitude: it is either from a rational point of # view or from a superrational point of view that one may approach, # for example, "Theta or Teth, has the value of Nine, which is that # of AVB, the Secret Magic of Obeah". # # Judged from a completely rational point of view, such a statement # seems to be gibberish, or a schizophrenic combination of unrelated # ideas, or to be the sort of idea which "accordingly appears to the # vulgar as fable, parable, legend, even creed.".... not if one understands the premise of gematria. then it becomes a very meaningful (if unconvincing) statement of magical, mystical, metaphysical and/or psychological relation. # And, from a completely rational point of # view, such a statement really is one or all of these things, for there # isn't a rational relationship between the letter T and AVB; one is a # letter, a sign representing a sound and number, the other is a word, # representing a thing or an idea. except that the letter T is *given* (or previously had) a a significance which can be compared with the combination AVB, equally meaningful, if otherwise presumed separate and unrelated. # But from an irrational point of view, that this statement makes # sense is an assumption one has to make at the beginning: # "since this makes sense, what does it mean?" With this # assumption, be it recognized by the reader or not, he has # discharged rationality, has let go of "AB does not equal C," or # "I can see this, so it exists; I can't see that, so it doesn't." # To make this assumption is to stop looking with the eyes of # reason and to start looking with other eyes. like those of the imagination. often qabalists fabricate these kinds of connections after having discovered numerical equations. sometimes this goes on to become tradition and a kind of self- fulfilling prophesy or mystical 'proof' employed in order to win over skeptics reading the author's text. # ...as "All advance in understanding demands the acquisition of # a new point-of-view", so is such an assumption a step toward # some kind of understanding. # # But what order of "understanding" or, better "useful # experience"? In my view, the following principle is the same # that is at work with Gematria: # the "peculiar mental excitement required may be aroused by # the perception of the absurdity of the process, and the # persistence in it..." As is this: "The mind is the great # enemy; so, by invoking enthusiastically a person whom we # know not to exist, we are rebuking that mind." To assume # something irrational, such as the premises of Gematria, # is to sheathe the sword of reason, and to loosen the bolts # of the gate des Jenseits, d'au-del_. To assume something # irrational is to invite the irrational. in a way I agree, but as I said above I don't think that your claims about gematria's irrationality are meaningful outside a very particular significance (e.g. Western scientism). perhaps you are being very specific and I'm being dull. # In an earlier post, Nigris made a statement to the effect that "any # language can be made magical or discovered to be magical." Such a # statement cannot be demonstrated, cannot be rationally proven; one has only to examine how 'magical languages' have become so in order to see the truth of the assertion. some might be more difficult than others, depending on the people who are attempting to use it as such and the nature of the language in question. # but to assume such an undemonstrable idea, to accept it, is in # fact prerequisite to making a language magical, or discovering # that one is. I would contend that the same principle is at work # with Gematria; it is after all not demonstrable that words and # phrases are mystically connected via numerical values, it seems fairly clear that it HAS been demonstrated that they CAN be (the 93/Thelema/Agape comes to mind), though of course I think this is typically done after the fact or with a batch of supportive construction after the relationship has been discovered. as with divination systems of any sort, we can enter into a mystical reverie and begin to understand the phenemena around us as communications from Elsewhere (God, the unconscious, our Holy Guardian Angel, the Daemon, etc.), and yet observed otherwise these phenemena would have about as much original relevance as did the happenstance enumerations (which were futzed with to no end by irritated QBLists! -- "oh a stray 1 added here or there is of no importance!") of the Jewish language -- that is absolutely none to be found. only the religious or fanatics seem to go beyond this and postulate the necessity of something more than oracular consciousness and the immersion of the conscious into the unconscious, projecting significance onto what could just as well be called 'random' phenomena (identical to how many tarot readers engage their art). perhaps this makes me a 'rational critic of gematria', and yet I think there is enough evidence to support an assertion that most gematria is reverse-engineered after the fact through expository argumentation and creative philosophy. what is 'discovered' becomes the foundation of a philosphic construct that, absent an historical overview, provides the appearance of mystical design (but is really tautological). # but, to see a mystical connection between them, it is necessary # to assume that there is one. To see something irrational, one # must begin in assuming that the irrational exists. (Yes, it # is circular, isn't it?) with this I must respectfully disagree. I have for years doubted any such mystical connection and yet have discovered all manner of them in the cosmos around me (or rather constructed them in reflection of the patterns I was finding). the state of mind in which I would sometimes see these connections was not in any way presumptive of a Grand Design or a necessary cosmology, in fact I'd say it was usually devoid of intellectual presumption. # Having done so, one has also aligned oneself with the writer # of such a thing as "Theta or Teth, has the value of Nine, # which is that of AVB, the Secret Magic of Obeah"; one has in # a sense put oneself in the same state of mind as he who wrote # it. Having done so, one looks for what he means by the # statement, and does so using not rationality, but # irrationality, a different part of being. In this way # something irrational, it having been encoded in writing, can # be apprehended by the reader. "Who has ears, let her hear." the apprehension of any perspective requires that we place ourselves in some part of the mindset of the speaker, to at least parse the language if nothing else. is it so surprising that, having entertained the mystical assertion of a connection between two objects, that we might understand it and therefore begin to maintain its intellectual viability? I suspect (probably foolishly) that the typical mystic who was (is?) fond of gematria as an indication of the truth of some metaphysical assertion was ignorant enough that a *description* of such a relationship constituted, for hir, a demonstration of this fact (especially if it arose in the context of an instruction by the kabbalah master). religious persuasion can be very insidious. the question is whether there are other indicators beyond the assertions that prove the point. very often (with Crowley, Grant, and the few Jewish kabbalists I have perused) it seemed to me that their argument was not in the least assisted by their appeal to gematria, it was just elaborated, as if they could say "see? even the god of this language says so by virtue of the enumeration!" perhaps needless to say I did not find their assertions convincing, and even found them quite tedious in the case of Grant. it strikes me as just so much trickery, since the author could have projected the entire argument in reflection of the specific correspondences she may have discovered. nothing more than the correspondence itself carries convincing weight in my eyes -- the gematria is just a lattice with which the mystic is attemping to bolster hir assertions and nothing more in these cases. now if the assertions were AGE-OLD, or at least constructed LONG before the discovery of the correspondence, then this would be more convincing. it is THIS usage of gematria (as a means of confirming a variety of mystical or unconscious appearances) which strikes me as the most persuasive. it was for this reason that I was so struck by the connection (however faint) between the name 'nigris', the character of Choronzon, and the number 333. Crowley suggests using gematria many times in the 'confirmation' of the identity of various spiritual intelligences (as you have noted also). we can add up the names we have obtained in reverie, total the passwords they provided, and compare and contrast the supposed or even predesignated (through ritual symbolism) symbol-set with the enumerations we did not preconstruct before the right but that came through the entity when we asked them for proof of their reliability. it is a kind of sounding system of the unconscious mind. # Enumeration of uses discussed so far: Gematria can ignite, # or cause to be put into use, the irrational by its rebuking # the rational and by its very invitation of the irrational. # This involves an undemonstrable assumption. Afterwards, a # writing employing Gematria can communicate to the reader # something irrational. # # A further use, this one creative. In designing a ceremony, # the magician can or ought to arrange his temple, weapons, and # words so that the experience of the ceremony excites the # aspect of being which is the ceremony's aim. The words # employed may have been or ought to have been invented or # chosen by the operator toward this specific end; having # designed or chosen words whose numerical values, summing up # to the value of some other word or set of words, are # consonant with the end, their use in rite can or will excite # the operator even toward that end. In this sense, Gematria # can be employed in a kind of creative association. "As I aim # toward one-pointedness, I employ the number 91, with which # is associated Kether as Achad, unity, and hence it is for the # numerical equality of his name that I invoke the god AMN." # The word AMN can or will in such a case accordingly excite the # aimed-for aspect of being. beautiful, yes. archivable so I leave it here, along with the bulk of that below. # A further use, still dependent on the assumption of the # interconnection of words and phrases through like numerical # values, is in testing the veracity or authenticity of # statements made by envisioned entities or of statements # issued by a voice-medium. One demands that the entity name # itself; later, one calculates the value of the entity's name # to see with what other words it numerically corresponds. as I mentioned above, yes. # This provides an objective, albeit irrational, method of # checking the entity's credentials. (The actual objective, # independent existence of the entity need not be presently discussed.) I don't see how this is irrational except in the manner of its derivation. I can explain how and why the unconscious mind might be capable of arriving at significant sums or words of specific and meaningful enumeration. what seems MORE important to me is that this type of post-ritual description can be used to FAKE a confirmation. I could easily have discovered BEFOREHAND that 'nigris' added through some gematric system to 333, thereafter constructing some sort of false belovedness of Choronzon and adopting the black motto. constructing a text which included the reference to this confirmation (as have many mages inclusive of Crowley), I could have included this as a testimony of my adeptship. the important point it seems to me is that the mage (and perhaps hir intimates) are the only ones who will be able to skeptically presume this testimony outside religious faith). this seems to be the case for many if not all instances of synchronicity. # A further method of Gematria is the creative connection of like # words in order either to communicate to, or discover for, # oneself something previously not realized, or to communicate # something already known to another. Hence the use of the # statement "Theta or Teth, has the value of Nine, which is that # of AVB, the Secret Magic of Obeah," or "MShICh, Messiah, and # NChSh, the serpent of Genesis. The dogma is that...." Both # statements will have been generated by the first process # described in this paragraph; both have been recorded in order # to communicate something to others. "Who has ears, let her hear." as you may have already deduced, I'm not sure that this is really different from the first you mentioned, aside perhaps from a difference of context. in fact you mentioned the communication aspect initially. # But tell me this: who is it who has "exploded" the premise # of Gematria bzw. Hebrew Qabalah? And by "the premise," is # one still to understand, "the universe is made up of letters"? this is in reference to the Wizard's testimony, and I cannot truly answer as to the this explosion. :> I do think that ONE premise (esp. of magick associated with gematria) is that the cosmos is constructed of the aleph-beth, however. # As to this last statement, so far no one on this list has # shown this not to be so, not even Nigris, whose words to # the effect that "letters are not generally considered to # be substance" are in my view not entirely relevant, for # by my understanding the universe is also not entirely # composed of "substance." well put. and yet you have failed to capture the final conclusion of my dispute, which was that letters and the cosmos are generally (unless by other supposition which I'm sure some mystics would have employed) considered to be of two different CATEGORIES. thus by *conventional* standards to say 'the cosmos is constructed of letters' is ludicrous outside a further explanation as regards consciousness and the importance of the alphabet to its arising. # Nor are letters "patterns." Letters represent something, # hence, depending on the language involved, either a sound # or an idea. what a wonderful conversation. now this is more like I enjoy in an explosion of gematria! (;>) moving to my Bible (Am Her Dic) for citation, I notice that it defines a letter as "a written symbol or character [that is a discernable pattern] representing a speech sound and being a component of an alphabet." thus letters are simultaneously a pattern and a symbol, as you say, representing a sound or, at least with some aleph-beths, an idea. # In the language of Qabalah, no small assertion!!! # letters, as they represent ideas, can be and indeed are # taken as symbols, and to a symbol one can associate whatever # ideas one likes. other languages could and do exhibit this same quality, or (as I intend to create over my rough English skeleton) could be created after the fact for the purposes of similar usage. # Following the association, the letter may be used as a kind # of short-hand representation of the other thing, with the # symbolic character of the letter having become transparent, # with the result that one sees through it directly to what # is meant by it. In this way, one can say, "Yod is Fire, # and Fire is a constituent element of the universe. Yod is # a constituent element of the universe." # # In this manner, one can say, "the universe is composed of # letters," and actually mean something by it. except that you have already presumed that the letters mean specific things, alone, not comprising the entirety of the universe. I can still only see the generalized application. # And since this is a convention, a definition, a dogma, it # is useless to say something like "It is false that the # universe is composed of letters." The only recourse is to # either understand what such a statement means, which I have attempted above. # or to show where an alternative definition provides a more # convenient, and thus more effective, definition of "what # the universe is made of." (And this is not to deny that # there are in fact better definitions.) 'made out of' usually (at least to the last 2000 and more years of physicalist science) implies that one can peer into the cosmic substrate through technical means and see that it is composed of a certain thing. we say that 'the cosmos is composed of energy' on account of the presumption that objects (rather than space which we account as nothing) are configurations of "energy" and can be seen as such. in this light we have not yet been able to peer into the material of objects and determine that they are constructed of "letters" unless by this term we mean something very unusual and peculiar (which would require explaining). # ...it is of no use to say to a German that his language # is gibberish out of ignorance of it, or to point out to him that # some "premise" behind his language has been "exploded," # telling him that it doesn't work, informing him of one's # incredulity at his continued use of it. with this I of course agree, though I think that there was a paradigm-clash going on when the Wizard critiqued what he considered a mystical (or possibly psychological as I have otherwise rendered) assertion from an apparent material perch. blessed beast! hara -- tyagi@houseofkaos.abyss.com (emailed replies may be posted); 408/2-666-SLUG http://www.abyss.com/tokus FUCK http://www.hollyfeld.org/~tyagi
The Arcane Archive is copyright by the authors cited.
Send comments to the Arcane Archivist: tyaginator@arcane-archive.org. |
Did you like what you read here? Find it useful?
Then please click on the Paypal Secure Server logo and make a small donation to the site maintainer for the creation and upkeep of this site. |
The ARCANE ARCHIVE is a large domain,
organized into a number of sub-directories, each dealing with a different branch of religion, mysticism, occultism, or esoteric knowledge. Here are the major ARCANE ARCHIVE directories you can visit: |
|
interdisciplinary:
geometry, natural proportion, ratio, archaeoastronomy
mysticism: enlightenment, self-realization, trance, meditation, consciousness occultism: divination, hermeticism, amulets, sigils, magick, witchcraft, spells religion: buddhism, christianity, hinduism, islam, judaism, taoism, wicca, voodoo societies and fraternal orders: freemasonry, golden dawn, rosicrucians, etc. |
SEARCH THE ARCANE ARCHIVE
There are thousands of web pages at the ARCANE ARCHIVE. You can use ATOMZ.COM
to search for a single word (like witchcraft, hoodoo, pagan, or magic) or an
exact phrase (like Kwan Yin, golden ratio, or book of shadows):
OTHER ESOTERIC AND OCCULT SITES OF INTEREST
Southern
Spirits: 19th and 20th century accounts of hoodoo,
including slave narratives & interviews
|